Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2346/2026 of ANEES AHMAD SHEIKH Vs SRINAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND OTHERS on 18 September 2026
No.97 SUPP CAUSE LIST HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2346/2026 CM(6382/2026) ANEES AHMAD SHEIKH …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. M. Haseeb Shah, Advocate with Mr. Mohammad Khalid, Advocate Vs. SRINAGAR MUNICIPALCORPORATION AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s)
Serial No.97
SUPP CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2346/2026
CM(6382/2026)
ANEES AHMAD SHEIKH
…Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:
Mr. M. Haseeb Shah, Advocate with
Mr. Mohammad Khalid, Advocate
Vs.
SRINAGAR
MUNICIPALCORPORATION AND
OTHERS
...Respondent(s)
Through:
Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.09.2026
1. After arguing for a while, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied in case the instant writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondents to treat the same as a representation and accord consideration to the same within a reasonable period.
2. On asking of the Court, Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, caused appearance and accepted notice on behalf of the respondents and he is not averse to the disposal of the instant petition by treating the same as representation. However, he submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered strictly in conformity with the law and the rules governing the field.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record.
4. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the very threshold as an innocuous prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the same is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and accord consideration to the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and the annexures appended thereto, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondents be forwarded to the petitioners by registered post.
5. Writ petition disposed of along with connected application(s) in the manner indicated above.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge
SRINAGAR: 18.09.2026 “ARIF”