Jammu and Kashmir High Court
LPA/157/2024 of ABDUL AZIZ GANAI Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE) on 15 September 2026
No.4 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR LPA 157/2024 CM(3548/2024) ABDUL AZIZ GANAI …PETITIONER(S) Through: Mr. A . Hanan, Advocate. V/s. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS ...RESPONDENT(S) Through: Mr. Zahid Qais Noor, Government Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE THE
Serial No.4
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
LPA 157/2024
CM(3548/2024)
ABDUL AZIZ GANAI
…PETITIONER(S)
Through:
Mr. A. Hanan, Advocate.
V/s.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS
...RESPONDENT(S)
Through:
Mr. Zahid Qais Noor, Government Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
15.09.2026
1. The counsel for the appellant tried to persuade this Court that the said allotment of land, which was being processed pursuant to his application as per the policy for the purpose of setting up an industry, has been refused only on the ground that the new policy has now come into vogue.
2. The counsel tried to impress upon the Court that his case was pending for a long time and, while he had applied for the allotment of 06 marls of land way back in 2015, which was also consequential to the earlier allotment made in November, 2010, then his case of allotment, which has been refused, ought to have been considered under the old policy.
3. This Court is of the firm opinion that the appellant was unable to show any arbitrariness or any other violation of the statute which could entitle him for consideration under the old policy.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant seeks liberty that he may be permitted to pursue his matter for allotment afresh under the new policy. Junaid Ayoub I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
5. The impugned judgment does not create any impediment in doing so. Thus, the present appeal is disposed of while giving liberty to the appellant to proceed as per the new industrial policy which is in vogue. The appellant shall, however, be at liberty to place all the previous facts which led him to seek allotment of 14 marlas of land before the respondents, and the same shall be considered and decided by the respondents strictly in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI) JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE
SRINAGAR: 15.09.2026 Junaid
Junaid Ayoub I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document