Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/1174/2026 of RATHER SOFTWARE HOUSE TH.ITS MANAGER Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.S.P CYBER POLICE (HOME) AND OTHERS on 14 September 2026
No. 57 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1174/2026 CM(3079/2026) RATHER SOFTWARE HOUSE TH.ITS MANAGER …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s). Through: Mr. Yavar Ramzan, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.S.P CYBER POLICE (HOME) AND OTHERS
Serial No. 57
Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1174/2026 CM(3079/2026)
RATHER SOFTWARE HOUSE
TH.ITS MANAGER
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s).
Through:
Mr. Yavar Ramzan, Advocate
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND
K TH.S.P CYBER POLICE
(HOME) AND OTHERS
...Respondent(s).
Through:
None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.09.2026
1. There is no representation on the part of the respondents.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has already taken steps for service of the respondents as per the court direction dated 22.05.2026.
3. Registry has not reported regarding the status of the service.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that his account lying with the respondents bank came to be frozen pursuant to the filing of a cyber crime complaint by one, Harshith N R Nelagadaranahalli, near Church Bangalore North 560073.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the complainant has subsequently on 05.03.2026 communicated to the Pery Police Station Bangalore Karnataka regarding closure of his cyber complaint as he had settled the issue with the accused/petitioner. It is further submitted by the learned counsel that he has in detail pleaded in the petition that there was no involvement of the petitioner in the alleged fraud and complainant upon verification of the facts stands satisfied which prompted him to make a communication regarding the closure of the complaint.
6. In this backdrop, the instant petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to defreeze the account of the petitioner as mentioned in the petition.
7. Disposed of.
(MOHD YOUSUF WANI)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 14.09.2026 Opinder