Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CM(M)/410/2026 of NAZIR AHMAD PARRA Vs GHULAM RASOOL SHEIKH on 14 September 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) 410/2026 CM(6167/2026). Nazir Ahmad Parra, 61 years S/O: Ahmad Parra R/O: Gudsathoo Budgam …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Fayaz, Advocate. VERSUS 1. Ghulam Rasool Sheikh. S/O Ghulam Mohammad Sheikh, R/O Gudsathoo Budgam 2. Feroz
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) 410/2026 CM(6167/2026).
Nazir Ahmad Parra, 61 years
S/O: Ahmad Parra
R/O: Gudsathoo Budgam
…Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. Bhat Fayaz, Advocate.
VERSUS
1. Ghulam Rasool Sheikh.
S/O Ghulam Mohammad Sheikh,
R/O Gudsathoo Budgam
2. Feroz Ahmad Sheikh
S/O Ghulam Mohammad Sheikh,
R/O Gudsathoo Budgam
3. Sheeraz Ahmad
S/O Habib Sheikh
R/O Nowgam, Chadoora, Budgam.
Through:
None.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.09.2026
1. The petitioner, through the medium of the present petition, seeks a direction to the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Budgam, to ensure effective compliance with and implementation of the order dated 21st August, 2025, passed by this Court in Civil Second Appeal No. 2/2022, to take all necessary and appropriate measures in accordance with law to preserve the subject property in its existing nature and condition and to S. No. 05 Regular
prevent any further alteration, alienation, construction, destruction or removal of planted trees therefrom during the pendency of the proceedings. The petitioner also seeks a direction for expeditious disposal of the pending appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit filed by the petitioner before the Court below travelled up to this Court in Civil Second Appeal No. 2/2022, which came to be decided vide judgment dated 21st August, 2025, whereby the judgment passed by the Appellate Court was set aside and the matter was remanded back to the First Appellate Court for fresh consideration.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that, despite the passage of considerable time, the appeal has not been taken up for effective consideration by the First Appellate Court. It is contended that the delay in disposal of the appeal is causing prejudice to the petitioner, as, in the meantime, the other side are bent upon to alter the nature and condition of the suit property with impunity and despite applications having been moved before the First Appellate Court, no effective action has been taken in the matter till date.
4. In view of the aforesaid, innocuous prayer made in the petition, it can be appropriately addressed by requesting the First Appellate Court to proceed with the matter expeditiously.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the First Appellate Court to proceed with the appeal in accordance with law, consider all aspects of the matter, and make every endeavour to dispose of the pending appeal at the earliest.
6. Disposed of along with all interim application(s) at this motion stage.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 14.09.2026 Bisma Jan.