Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/2235/2026 of AJAZ AHMAD AHANGER AND OTHERS Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (REVENUE) on 14 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2235/2026 CM(6077/2026) AJAZ AHMAD AHANGER AND OTHERS …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s). Through: Mr. Wani Manzoor, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (REVENUE) ...Respondent(s). Through: Mr.

S.No.8

Regular Cause List

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

WP(C) 2235/2026 CM(6077/2026)

AJAZ AHMAD AHANGER AND

OTHERS

…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s).

Through:

Mr. Wani Manzoor, Advocate

Vs.

UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K

AND OTHERS (REVENUE)

...Respondent(s).

Through:

Mr. Hakeem Aman Ali, Dy. AG

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

14.09.2026

1. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would feel satisfied in case the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners placed on record of the instant petition within a reasonable time frame.

2. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Hakeem Aman Ali, learned Dy. AG, has caused appearance on behalf of the respondents, who is not averse to the disposal of the present writ petition in the manner proposed by learned counsel for the petitioners. However, he submits that the representation of the petitioners shall be considered strictly in accordance with law and the rules governing the field.

3. In view of the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners, strictly in accordance with law and the rules governing the field, within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order, along with all relevant annexure/s, is made available to them.

4. It is further directed that, before passing the order on the representation, the petitioners shall be afforded an adequate opportunity of being heard. The order so passed shall be communicated to the petitioners within one week thereafter through registered post.

5. Disposed of in the manner indicated above.

(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)

JUDGE

SRINAGAR: 14-09-2026 Mubashir

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead