Jammu and Kashmir High Court
RP/37/2024 of GHULAM HASSAN BHAT Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE) on 11 September 2026
No. 03 SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR RP 37/2024 In[LPA 30/2024] Ghulam Hassan Bhat …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Fayaz, Advocate with Ms. Nighat Amin, Advocate Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Asifa
Serial No. 03
SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
RP 37/2024
In[LPA 30/2024]
Ghulam Hassan Bhat
…Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. Bhat Fayaz, Advocate with
Ms. Nighat Amin, Advocate
Vs.
Union Territory of J&K and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through:
Ms. Asifa Padroo, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
11.09.2026
01. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record, we are of the considered opinion that there is no error apparent on the face of the record which would require us to review or recall our order and reconsider the matter.
02. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also failed to demonstrate any other ground for reviewing the judgment. He, however, submits that some civil litigation is pending between the parties and, therefore, the observation made in the judgment sought to be reviewed should not prejudice either of the parties.
03. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, we find no good ground to review the judgment MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 15.09.26
dated 01.07.2024 passed in LPA No. 30/2024. Needless to say that the entries in the revenue record, as also the mutations attested therein, are always subject to the decrees passed by the civil court. Therefore, the apprehension of the review petitioner that the observation made by us in the judgment sought to be reviewed would prejudice the pending civil litigation is wholly without substance.
04. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 11.09.2026 “Mir Arif”
MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 15.09.26