Jammu and Kashmir High Court
RP/35/2024 of MOHAMMAD RIDWAN DARZI AND ORS. Vs STATE OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE) on 11 September 2026
No. 06 SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR RP 35/2024 In[OWP 351/2012] Mohammad Ridwan Darzi & Ors. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kamil Nazir, Advocate Vs. State of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s)
Serial No. 06
SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
RP 35/2024
In[OWP 351/2012]
Mohammad Ridwan Darzi & Ors.
…Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kamil Nazir, Advocate
Vs.
State of J&K and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
11.09.2026
01. Despite opportunities granted, the respondents have not filed their objections.
02. The instant petition seeks review of the order and judgment dated 9th July, 2024, passed by this Court in OWP No. 351/2012, titled “Mohammad Ridwan Darzi and Ors. vs. State of J&K and Ors.”, on the ground that this Court has erroneously quashed the order dated 6th January, 2009, passed by the District Magistrate, Anantnag, whereas the order impugned in the writ petition was dated 20th January, 2012.
03. We have heard learned counsel for the review petitioner and perused the material on record. We are of the considered opinion that a mistake has crept in while referring to the order impugned. Indisputably, the order which was challenged in OWP MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 15.09.26
No. 351/2012 was the order passed by the District Magistrate dated 20th January, 2012, whereas this Court has treated the order of the District Magistrate dated 6th January, 2009, as the order impugned and set aside the same.
04. The error is thus apparent on the face of the record, which renders the judgment liable to be recalled. The review petition is, accordingly, allowed and the judgment dated 09.07.2024 passed in OWP No. 351/2012 is recalled.
05. Let OWP No. 351/2012 be listed for consideration before the Bench the Bench having roster on 14.10.2026.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 11.09.2026 “Mir Arif”
MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 15.09.26