Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2246/2026 of M/S HILAL PRINTING PRESS SOPORE TH.ITS PROPRIETOR Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (SOCIAL WELFARE) AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
125 Suppl Cause List-1 IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2246/2026 CM(6130/2026) M/S HILAL PRINTING PRESS SOPORE TH.ITS PROPRIETOR …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Umar Rashid Wani, Advocate Vs. UT of JK and others ...Respondent(s) Through: None
S. No. 125
Suppl Cause List-1
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2246/2026
CM(6130/2026)
M/S HILAL PRINTING PRESS SOPORE
TH.ITS PROPRIETOR
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Umar Rashid Wani, Advocate
Vs.
UT of JK and others
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
11.09.2026
1. After hearing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied, if the respondents are directed to treat the instant writ petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and consider the grievances raised therein in accordance with law within a reasonable time frame. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner would not press the present petition on merits, provided an appropriate direction is issued to the competent authority for consideration and disposal of the representation.
2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No. 2, the Mission Director, Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS)/Poshan, Jammu and Kashmir, to treat the writ petition along with the documents annexed thereto as a
representation of the petitioner and consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
3. While considering the representation, respondent No. 2 shall examine the grievances and claims raised by the petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon, keeping in view the applicable rules, regulations and governing instructions.
4. Let the aforesaid exercise be completed by respondent No. 2 within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order, along with the complete paper book, is made available to him.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claims or grievances raised by the petitioner, and the competent authority shall consider the matter independently and strictly in accordance with law.
6. Disposed of accordingly, along with the connected CM(s).
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE Srinagar 11.09.2026 “Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 14.09.2026 14:52