Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2241/2026 of ALI MOHAMMAD KOCHEY AND OTHERS Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (RURAL DEVELOPMENT) AND OTHERS on 11 September 2026
133 Suppl. List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 2241/2026 Ali Mohammad Kochey and Ors. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Adv and Ms. Subreena Bashir, Adv. Vs. UT of JK and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ilyas Laway, GA. CORAM:
S. No. 133
Suppl. List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 2241/2026
Ali Mohammad Kochey and Ors.
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through:
Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Adv and Ms. Subreena Bashir, Adv.
Vs.
UT of JK and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through:
Mr. Ilyas Laway, GA.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
11.09.2026
01. Mr. Shafqat Nazir, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition be disposed by commanding the respondents 2 to 4 to proceed in accordance with law regarding the alleged encroachment made by the respondent no. 8 by installing gate on the Culvert.
02. Notice.
03. Notice waived by Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway, learned GA, on behalf of respondents 1 to 7. There is no need to issue notice to respondent no. 8.
04. Mr. Ilyas Laway, learned GA, submits that respondents 2 and 3 shall proceed in the matter in accordance with law.
05. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of and the respondents 2 and 3 to proceed in accordance with law regarding the alleged encroachment made by respondent no. 8 by installing the gate on Kulvert. The respondents 2 and 3, while proceeding in the matter, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to respondent no. 8 as well. This Court is sanguine that appropriate orders will be passed by the respondents 2 and 3 in accordance with law within a period of one month.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 11.09.2026 “Shamim Dar”