Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2230/2026 of MANZOOR AHMAD KHAN Vs FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS on 9 September 2026
No. 64 Supplementary list IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2230/2026 MANZOOR AHMAD KHAN ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Anupam Raina, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Parihar, Advocate and Mr. Shahid Ashraf, Advocate V/s FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No. 64 Supplementary list
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2230/2026
MANZOOR AHMAD KHAN ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Anupam Raina, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Parihar, Advocate and Mr. Shahid Ashraf, Advocate
V/s
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS ….. Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Umar Farooq, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
(ORDER) 09.09.2026
01. Petitioner has invoked writ jurisdiction of this Court for the quashment of order dated 17.07.2026, whereby he came to be transferred from PEG, Anantnag to Rajasthan Zone and order dated 22.07.2026, whereby, he came to be relieved.
02. The short grievance projected by the petitioner is that his daughter being indisposed and suffering with kidney disease, is undergoing monthly medical treatment, regular consultations and investigations. Her medical condition requires continuous monitoring and his presence is indispensable. His minor daughter, a student of 6th Class, needs proper care and attention and he himself being indisposed is already on medical leave. Therefore, Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
immediately after the impugned orders came to be passed, he preferred a representation on 18.07.2026, for redressal of his grievance, which till date has not been accorded consideration.
03. After arguing for a while, Mr. Anupam Raina, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if respondents are directed to consider the representation preferred by the petitioner in a time bound manner and till then consider his placement anywhere in the Kashmir province.
04. Having regard to the limited nature of controversy and an innocuous prayer made by learned senior counsel for the petitioner, present petition is admitted to hearing and disposed of with a direction to the respondents to sympathetically consider the representation dated 18.07.2026, preferred by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date copy of this order, alongwith writ petition and annexures is made available. Respondents are also directed to consider the placement/posting of petitioner anywhere in Kashmir Province till his representation is decided, as per law.
05. Disposed of along with connected CM(s).
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 09.09.2026 “Mohammad Yasin Dar”
Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document