Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CCP(S)/231/2024 of M/S DESIGN AND PLANNING FORUM Vs KUMAR RAJEEV RANJAN AND ANR. (SKILL DEVELOPMENT) on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 16 Regular Cause List. HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR ******* CCP(S) 231/2024 in[WP(C) 933/2023] CM(3972/2026) CM(5637/2025). M/S DESIGN AND PLANNING FORUM. …Petitioner (s) Through: Ms Maria, Advocate. VERSUS KUMAR RAJEEV RANJAN AND ANR. Through: Mr. G.N. Sofi,

Serial No. 16

Regular Cause List.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

*******

CCP(S) 231/2024 in[WP(C) 933/2023]

CM(3972/2026) CM(5637/2025).

M/S DESIGN AND PLANNING FORUM.

…Petitioner (s)

Through:

Ms Maria, Advocate.

VERSUS

KUMAR RAJEEV RANJAN AND ANR.

Through:

Mr. G.N. Sofi, Government Advocate.

…Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

09-09-2026

01. In terms of Order dated 26th of April, 2023, passed by this Court, the Writ petition was disposed of in terms of the following directions: “Having regard to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant Writ petition is disposed of at its threshold, with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner as projected in the Writ petition and take a decision thereon within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this Order is furnished by the petitioner to them subject to verification of the requisite bills. The decision so taken by the respondents shall be conveyed to the petitioner”

02. The Respondents have come up with a response stating therein that the claim of the petitioner was considered in compliance of the order passed by this Court and the same was found to be devoid of any merit.

Accordingly, the same was rejected in terms of Consideration Order dated 2nd of June, 2026, passed by the respondents.

03. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, as available under law, regarding Consideration Order dated 2nd of June, 2026, passed by the respondents, whereby the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.

(Rajnesh Oswal)

Judge

SRINAGAR 09-09-2026 Showkat Khan

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead