Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2171/2026 of MOHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K THROUGH TEHSILDAR TANGMARG AND ANOTHER on 7 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2171/2026 CM(5902/2026 MOHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN ….. Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Naveed Bukhtiyar, Adv. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K THROUGH TEHSILDAR TANGMARG AND ANOTHER .. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: Hon’ble Mr.
30
Regular
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2171/2026 CM(5902/2026
MOHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN
….. Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. Naveed Bukhtiyar, Adv.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K THROUGH TEHSILDAR TANGMARG
AND ANOTHER
.. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07.09.2026
1. The petitioner has filed this petition for commanding the respondent No. 1 and 2 to take immediate lawful preventive measures for preventing any breach of peace, confrontation, cognizable offence or law and order situation in connection with the plying of passenger vehicles on the Khaipora-Tangmarg route. The petitioner has also sought issuance of direction to the respondent No. 2 to ensure that the petitioner’s passenger vehicles and drivers are not unlawfully stopped, obstructed, intimidated, diverted or interfered with, in light of order dated 14.08.2026 passed by the Assistant Reginal Transport Officer, Baramulla.
2. The mode and manner in which the present petition has been filed is very unique as the petitioner has placed on record resolution authorizing him to file the present petition but at the same time in para (1) of the petition he has stated that he has filed the present petition in his individual capacity. The petitioner has not able to give particulars of the vehicles/drivers in the present petition. The petition being vague, as such, cannot be taken cognizance of and is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh with better particulars.
(Rajnesh Oswal)
Judge
SRINAGAR 07.09.2026 Aasif