Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/74/2025 of MOHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN AND ANR. Vs KUMAR RAJEEV RANJAN AND ORS. (REVENUE) on 7 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(5901/2026) IN CCP(S) 74/2025 MOHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN AND ANR. ….. Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Saiqa, Adv. vice Mr. M M Dar, Adv. KUMAR RAJEEV RANJAN AND ORS. .. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. M Sultan, Adv. Coram: Hon’ble
13
Regular
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CM(5901/2026) IN CCP(S) 74/2025
MOHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN AND ANR.
….. Petitioner(s)
Through:
Ms. Saiqa, Adv.
vice Mr. M M Dar, Adv.
KUMAR RAJEEV RANJAN AND ORS.
.. Respondent(s)
Through:
Mr. M Sultan, Adv.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07.09.2026
1. CM No. 5901/2026:
2. This is an application filed by the intervener (respondent No. 7) to intervene in the above titled contempt petition. It is submitted in the application that the order which is subject matter of the present contempt petition stands modified by the Division Bench as such the present contempt petition cannot be continued.
3. Ms. Saiqa, Advocate submits that the contempt petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy as is available under law.
4. CM disposed of. CCP(S) No. 74/2025:
5. The date in the contempt petition is preponed and is taken up today.
6. Since the order which is subject matter of the contempt petition has been modified by the Division Bench and the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the contempt proceedings be dropped with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy as is available under law. The proceedings against the respondents are dropped and the contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy as is available under law.
(Rajnesh Oswal)
Judge
SRINAGAR 07.09.2026 Aasif