Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/308/2025 of M/S WANI CONSTRUCTIONS Vs SHREYA SINGHAL, I.A.S MD TOURISM DEV. CORPORATION on 1 September 2026
No. 31 Regular Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR ******* CCP(S) 308/2025 in[WP(C) 1835/2025] CM(3709/2026). M/S WANI CONSTRUCTIONS. …Petitioner (s) Through: Ms. Arifa Jan, Sr Advocate with Ms. Moomina Aslam, Advocate. VERSUS SHREYA SINGHAL, I.A.S MD TOURISM
Serial No. 31
Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
*******
CCP(S) 308/2025 in[WP(C) 1835/2025]
CM(3709/2026).
M/S WANI CONSTRUCTIONS.
…Petitioner (s)
Through:
Ms. Arifa Jan, Sr Advocate with
Ms. Moomina Aslam, Advocate.
VERSUS
SHREYA SINGHAL, I.A.S MD TOURISM DEV. CORPORATION.
Through:
Mr. Hakeem Aman Ali, Dy. AG.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
01-09-2026
1. In terms of order dated 4th of August, 2025, passed by this Court in WP (C) No. 1835 of 2025, the writ petition preferred by the petitioner was disposed of in absence of any response from the respondents, by directing the respondents to immediately look into the case of the petitioner and verify the same and ensure payment of the amount, whatever due to him, on account of execution of the work, i.e, “Renovation/upgradation of the two number Double Bedrooms Hut at T.E. Kokernag” in the year 2016.
2. The respondents, in turn, have come up with a Statement of Facts by asserting that the claim of the petitioner was considered and rejected in terms of order dated 3rd of June, 2026, by stating that the codal formalities were not followed and payment cannot be released in violation of
Government Circular dated 26th of April, 2021. This Court cannot travel beyond the order dated 4th of August, 2025.
3. As such, the proceedings in the present contempt petition are closed, leaving the petitioner free to avail appropriate remedy as available under law regarding the Consideration Order dated 3rd of June, 2026 passed by the respondents.
4. The instant contempt petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(Rajnesh Oswal)
Judge
SRINAGAR 01-09-2026 Showkat Khan