Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CM(M)/391/2026 of HAFEEZA AND OTHERS Vs SABIYA HASSAN on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) 391/2026. 1) Hafeeza W/o Late Mohammad Maqbool Sheikh R/o Tangpora Batmaloo Byepass 2) Adil Ahmad Shah S/o Showkat Ahmad Shah R/o Aquil Mir Khanyar, Srinagar, At present: Qamarabad Qamarwari, Srinagar 3) Anjum Ara W/o Adil Ahmad Shah R/o

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

CM(M) 391/2026.

1) Hafeeza

W/o Late Mohammad Maqbool Sheikh

R/o Tangpora Batmaloo Byepass

2) Adil Ahmad Shah

S/o Showkat Ahmad Shah

R/o Aquil Mir Khanyar, Srinagar,

At present: Qamarabad Qamarwari, Srinagar

3) Anjum Ara

W/o Adil Ahmad Shah

R/o Aquil Mir Khanyar, Srinagar

At present: Qamarabad Qamarwari, Srinagar.

…Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Abu Owais Pandit, Advocate.

VERSUS

Sabiya Hassan

D/o Ghulam Hassan Bhat

R/O. Firdousa Bad Batmaloo Srinagar.

Through: None.

…Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

01.09.2026

1. The petitioners, through the medium of the present petition, seek a direction upon the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar, for disposal of the applications moved by them seeking dropping of the S. No.88 Suppl- I

proceedings and modification of the order dated 27.05.2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar, in a Domestic Violence Act petition, titled “Sabia Hussain & Anr. Vs. Aijaz Ahmad Sheikh & Ors.” within a reasonable period.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent, who is the daughter-in-law of the petitioners, has instituted proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005,wherein they had moved the aforesaid applications, however, despite the applications having remained pending for more than one year, the matter has not been finally disposed of by the learned Magistrate. He further submits that, in view of the aforesaid submissions, the petitioners would be satisfied if the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the learned Magistrate to proceed with the matter expeditiously.

3. In view of the pleadings and the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar, to proceed in the matter expeditiously, in accordance with the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

4. Disposed of.

(M. A. CHOWDHARY)

JUDGE

SRINAGAR 01.09.2026 Bisma Jan.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead