Jammu and Kashmir High Court

RSA/18/2026 of MOHAMMAD SUBHAN NAJAR Vs MOHD AKBAR AND OTHERS on 31 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 02 Regular Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR RSA No. 18/2026 CM No. 5404/2026 Caveat No. 1158/2026 Mohammad Subhan Najar … Appellant(s) Through: - Mr Gulzar Ahmad Bhat, Advocate. V/s Mohammad Akbar and Ors. … Respondent(s) Through: - Mr Sameer

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Serial No. 02 Regular Cause List

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR

RSA No. 18/2026 CM No. 5404/2026 Caveat No. 1158/2026

Mohammad Subhan Najar … Appellant(s)

Through: - Mr Gulzar Ahmad Bhat, Advocate.

V/s

Mohammad Akbar and Ors. … Respondent(s) Through: - Mr Sameer Hassan, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.

(ORDER) 31.08.2026

Caveat No. 1158/2026:

01. With the appearance of Mr Sameer Hassan, learned Advocate, on behalf of the Caveators/ Respondents No. 1 and 2, Caveat No. 1158/2026 shall stand discharged, accordingly.

RSA No. 18/2026; CM No. 5404/2026:

02. At the very outset, learned Counsel appearing for Respondents No. 1 and 2 submits that Respondents No. 3, 4, 7 and 11 have died during the pendency of the first appeal, however, despite that, they have been arrayed as Respondents by the Appellant in this Civil Second appeal, as such, the instant appeal is not maintainable against the said Respondents, having been filed against dead persons.

03. Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that the Appellant be allowed to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a fresh one, thereby incorporating substantial questions of law, if any, involved and also taking care of the development with regard to death of the aforesaid Respondents in the case. His statement is taken on record.

04. In view of above, the present appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the Appellant to file a fresh one, as aforesaid, within a period of two weeks from today, for which purpose the issue of limitation shall not come in the way of the Appellant for the said two weeks only.

05. Dismissed, along with the connected CM.

(M. A. CHOWDHARY)

JUDGE SRINAGAR August 31st, 2026 “TAHIR”

Tahir Manzoor Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead