Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/177/2023 of AATIF IRSHAD KUMAR Vs MR. ARUN KUMAR AND OTHERS on 31 August 2026
40 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 177/2023 CM No. 5302/2026 AATIF IRSHAD KUMAR …Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: Mr. B.A. Tak, Advocate Vs. MR. ARUN KUMAR AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Shahbaz Sikander, AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR.
Sr. No. 40
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 177/2023
CM No. 5302/2026
AATIF IRSHAD KUMAR
…Petitioner(s)/appellant(s)
Through:
Mr. B.A. Tak, Advocate
Vs.
MR. ARUN KUMAR AND OTHERS
...Respondent(s)
Through:
Mr. Shahbaz Sikander, AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
31.08.2026
1. In view of the fact that the amount of compensation as well as the interest stands deposited by the respondents, the proceedings in the contempt petition are closed.
CM No. 5302/2026
2. This is an application seeking release of the interest part of the awarded amount in favour of the father of the victim.
3. In terms of the judgment dated 17.11.2022, the monthly interest earned on the amount of compensation of Rs. 30,20,000/- was allowed to be withdrawn by the father of the petitioner during the period of minority of petitioner. The amount of Rs. 9,66,400/- stands already deposited with the Registry of this Court.
4. Accordingly, the above-mentioned amount is allowed to be withdrawn by the father of the victim petitioner in terms of judgment dated 17.11.2022. Further, the monthly interest earned upon the
compensation of Rs. 30,20,000/- be also released in favour of the father of the petitioner so as to enable him to spend the same for the welfare of the minor petitioner.
5. The application is accordingly disposed of.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 31.08.2026 Junaid