Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/1109/2022 of SAIQA NABI Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT) on 29 August 2026
47 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1109/2022 SAIQA NABI …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None. Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nowbahar Khan, Assisting Counsel. CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE O
S. No. 47
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1109/2022
SAIQA NABI
…Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through: None.
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nowbahar Khan, Assisting Counsel.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
29.08.2026 Learned counsel for the respondents submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, case of the petitioner was considered by the respondents and same was found devoid of merit, accordingly, stood rejected. In this regard, a detailed order dated 05.08.2024 was passed. Be that as it may. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last two consecutive dates of hearing. Today also, neither the petitioner nor her counsel is present. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the case. In view of above, petition is dismissed in default and for non- prosecution. Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 29.08.2026 Ishaq
Isaq Hameed Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 29.08.26