Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CM(M)/233/2026 of ZAHID ALI MIR Vs NUSRAT ALI KHAWAJA on 22 July 2026
No. 02 REGULAR CAUSE LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) No. 233/2026 Zahid Ali Mir …Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs. Nusrat Ali Khawaja ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER 22.07.2026 1. Nemo for the
Serial No. 02
REGULAR CAUSE LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) No. 233/2026
Zahid Ali Mir
…Petitioner(s)
Through:
None
Vs.
Nusrat Ali Khawaja
...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
22.07.2026
1. Nemo for the petitioner.
2. This Court, in terms of an order dated 03.07.2026, had identified to the learned counsel for the petitioner an elementary factual deficiency in the petition about missing name of the petitioner’s minor son and, thus, solicited the learned counsel for the petitioner to mention the name of the petitioner’s minor son.
3. Time was granted for doing needful on the next date 8th July, 2026, when it came to be apprised to this Court that the intended application is ready bearing the name of petitioner’s minor son, even that has not been submitted.
4. Today counsel for the petitioner is absent.
5. This petition is aimed against an innocuous order dated 18.05.2026 passed by the court of Principal Judge, Family court, Srinagar, in terms whereof modification has been done with respect to order dated 15.04.2026 in so far as meeting place of the petitioner with his minor son is concerned.
6. In terms of order dated 15.04.2026, the petitioner was permitted to meet his minor son at ADR Centre, District Court, Haryana on 4th Saturday of every month from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM, whereas in terms of order dated 18.05.2026 the place of meeting has been shifted from ADR Centre, District Court, Haryana to ADR Centre, Saket, District Court, New Delhi with rest of the protocol of meeting and timing retained as it is.
7. This Court finds no scope for sparing supervisory jurisdiction under article 227 of the Constitution of
India to exercise of discretion by the court below and, thus, petition is dismissed as meritless.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 22.07.2026 Imtiyaz
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 27.07.2026 12:59