Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/1590/2026 of INHABITANTS OF VILLAGE BOMAI SOPORE Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (REVENUE) on 10 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM No. (4127/2026) in WP(C) No. 1590/2026 CM No. (4128/2026) Inhabitants of Village Bomai, Sopore …Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Wani Manzoor, Advocate VERSUS Union Territory of J&K And Ors. …Respondent(s) Through:

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

CM No. (4127/2026) in WP(C) No. 1590/2026

CM No. (4128/2026)

Inhabitants of Village Bomai, Sopore

…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Wani Manzoor, Advocate

VERSUS

Union Territory of J&K And Ors.

…Respondent(s)

Through:

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

10.07.2026

1. This Court is not convinced that Mr. Mohammad Ashraf Bhat is coming up with a genuine representative character and antecedents to represent the inhabitants of village Bomai, Sopore to complain against encroachment of a common pathway and seeking its restoration otherwise the first thing to be done in alleged state of circumstances related to encroachment of a common pathway is an immediate representation to the Deputy Commissioner, Baramulla drawing his attention to the objectionable state of affairs and seeking his administrative interference and indulgence being vested not only with the revenue side jurisdiction but also with the magisterial power to ensure that Sr. No. 144 Supp. 1

common pathways do not suffer any encroachment but without bothering himself to go to the Deputy Commissioner, Baramulla coming up with representative writ petition in the High Court of J&K and Ladakh, Srinagar Wing is nothing but a flight of fancy on the part of Mohammad Ashraf Bhat.

2. As such, this Court is not inclined to give indulgence in CM No. 4127/2026 whereby leave of this Court is being solicited for maintaining the writ petition in a representative capacity.

3. Thus, the writ petition is not entertained without prejudice to the right of Mohammad Ashraf Bhat as a purported representative of village Bomai to approach Deputy Commissioner, Baramulla for his indulgence, which if sought be granted by a proper inquiry into the matter.

4. Disposed of.

(RAHUL BHARTI)

JUDGE

SRINAGAR 10.07.2026 Akhil Dev

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead