Jammu and Kashmir High Court

HCP/263/2025 of AQIB AHMAD RENZU Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME) on 9 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

REGULAR CAUSE LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR HCP No. 263/2025 Aqib Ahmad Renzu …Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Tabiya, Advocate Vs. UT of Jammu & Kashmir and Others ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER

Serial No. 13

REGULAR CAUSE LIST

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

HCP No. 263/2025

Aqib Ahmad Renzu

…Petitioner(s)

Through:

Ms. Tabiya, Advocate

Vs.

UT of Jammu & Kashmir and

Others

...Respondent(s)

Through:

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

09.07.2026

1. The writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time as the petitioner has earned his release from the jail custody upon expiring of the maximum detention period served by him.

2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

(RAHUL BHARTI)

JUDGE

SRINAGAR: 09.07.2026 Imtiyaz

Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 15.07.2026 10:06

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead