Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/2883/2022 of MUSHTAQ AHMAD MIR AND ORS. Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) on 9 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 2883/2022 CM No. (7253/2022) Mushtaq Ahmad Mir And Ors. …Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M. A . Thakur, Advocate VERSUS Union Territory of J&K And Ors. …Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ilayas Laway, GA CORAM:

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

WP(C) No. 2883/2022

CM No. (7253/2022)

Mushtaq Ahmad Mir And Ors.

…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. M. A. Thakur, Advocate

VERSUS

Union Territory of J&K And Ors.

…Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Ilayas Laway, GA

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

09.07.2026

1. This Court is disposing of this writ petition with a direction to none else than the Deputy Commissioner, Budgam to call for the file of representation dated 21.02.2022 which was submitted by the three petitioners before the District Development Commissioner, Budgam whereupon endorsement was made for Naib Tehsildar concerned to carry out verification and report along with proper revenue extracts and also bearing some direction for the Tehsildar, Budgam to do course action but the petitioners found themselves in lurch by receiving no response and Sr. No. 2 Regular

then landing themselves right in the present writ petition urging this Court to get the direction unto the Deputy Commissioner, Budgam to do what he is supposed to do i.e., of addressing and redressing the grievances of the Inhabitants of the district.

2. The petitioners in this writ petition came up with a grievance that their land comprising khasra No. 340 min of village Haripora to an extent of 4 feet x 70 feet came under road widening with effect from 2018 without any payment of compensation to them.

3. It is in this context that the three petitioners, who by birth are with physical condition which is known as ‘Dwarf’, were expecting the Deputy Commissioner, Budgam to spare time and energy for addressing their concern but that not taking place resulted in the institution of the present writ petition which is now getting disposal by virtue of a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Budgam to dispose of the pending representation of the petitioners by affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners also and dispose of the matter within a period of one month from the date of appearance of the petitioners before him upon being summoned.

4. Disposed of.

5. A copy of this order be provided to Mr. Ilayas Laway, learned Government Advocate for the sake of notice and compliance on the part of the Deputy Commissioner, Budgam.

(RAHUL BHARTI)

JUDGE

SRINAGAR 09.07.2026 Akhil Dev

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead