Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/1041/2022 of FAROOQ AHMAD SHEIKH Vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND ORS. (DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT) on 8 July 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1041/2022 CM(2598/2022). Farooq Ahmad Sheikh. …Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Areeb Javed Kawoosa, Advocate & Mr. Aatir Javed Kawoosa, Advocate. VERSUS Deputy Director & Ors. …Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T. M.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1041/2022 CM(2598/2022).
Farooq Ahmad Sheikh.
…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. Areeb Javed Kawoosa, Advocate &
Mr. Aatir Javed Kawoosa, Advocate.
VERSUS
Deputy Director & Ors.
…Respondent(s)
Through:
Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI with
Ms Bisma Ali, Assisting Counsel.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08.07.2026
1. The petitioner- Farooq Ahmad Sheikh came forward with the present writ petition when he was confronted with an eviction notice dated 16.12.2021 for legal course of action aimed at seeking his eviction from the premises/property, which had come under the effects of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, with the Enforcement Directorate being in cognizance of the investigation/enquiry.
2. The institution of this writ petition had taken place on 21.05.2022.
3. During the pendency of the writ petition and because of intervening developments, in terms whereof the petitioner led himself to appropriate appellate proceedings before the appellate tribunal under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators Act (SAFEMA), New Delhi, and also resorted to proceedings under 08 Regular
the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the present petition has lost its efficacy and purpose, making this Court a mute spectator to proceedings in which this Court cannot grant any indulgence due to the constraints and restraints imposed by the statute.
4. Mr. Areeb Javed Kawoosa and Mr. Aatir Javed Kawoosa, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw this petition without prejudice to his remedies available under law which he has already resorted to and which may come across for him to avail by reference to the subject matter of the present writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted as prayed for.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 08.07.2026 Bisma Jan.