Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/1499/2026 of MOHAMMAD SHAFI DAR Vs NEELOFAR BEGUM AND OTHERS on 4 July 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1499/2026 CM(3930/2026). Mohammad Shafi Dar. …Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Khursheed, Advocate. VERSUS Neelofar Begum And Others. …Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1499/2026 CM(3930/2026).
Mohammad Shafi Dar.
…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. Bhat Khursheed, Advocate.
VERSUS
Neelofar Begum And Others.
…Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
04.07.2026
01. This Court has no jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution of India to pass directions unto the civil/criminal courts for expediting the hearing of a civil/criminal case pending before a given Court, as the only available jurisdiction in this context is traceable to article 227 of the Constitution of India vesting supervisory jurisdiction in this Court vis-à-vis the Courts and Tribunals.
02. Therefore, this writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India for the purpose of seeking the relief as prayed for therein is misconceived and hence dismissed with liberty in favour of the petitioner to avail appropriate legal remedy.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 04.07.2026 Bisma Jan. 108 Suppl-I