Jammu and Kashmir High Court

OWP/484/2017 of YASMEEN AKHTER Vs STATE OF JK AND OTHERS (SOCIAL WELFARE) on 3 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR OWP 484/2017 c/w i)CCP 31/2025. Yasmeen Akhter. …Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mian Tufail, Advocate. VERSUS State Of JK And Others. …Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T. A . Lone, Dy AG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

OWP 484/2017

c/w

i)CCP 31/2025.

Yasmeen Akhter.

…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through:

Mr. Mian Tufail, Advocate.

VERSUS

State Of JK And Others.

…Respondent(s)

Through:

Mr. T. A. Lone, Dy AG.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

03.07.2026

01. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition considering the fact that it has remained pending on the docket of this Court for the last more than eight years and has served no purpose for the petitioner, who is the plaintiff in a civil suit on File No. 104/Numbri dated 16.02.2009.

02. In the said suit, the petitioner is seeking a declaration to upset the selection list of Anganwari Workers issued by the Child Development Project Officer (ICDS) Khansahab and the District Social Welfare Officer, Budgam which led to the engagement of respondent No. 6- Nayeema Akhter, who is defendant No. 6 in the suit.

03. The petitioner, as plaintiff, is pursuing the civil suit whereas the present petition filed by the petitioner was, in effect, as if chasing a mirage. 03 Regular

04. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

05. The trial court is directed to proceed ahead with the civil suit and, in case issues have not been framed as on date, the same be framed including an issue regarding the maintainability of the civil suit and adjudication thereupon be carried out without wastage of time.

06. Accordingly, OWP No. 484/2017 and CCP No. 31/2025 stands dismissed as withdrawn.

07. This Court only needs to say that Civil Procedure Code, 1908 is the best guide for the civil courts to proceed in accordance therewith in connection with the adjudication of civil suit/s.

(RAHUL BHARTI)

JUDGE

SRINAGAR 03.07.2026 Bisma Jan.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead