Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/1105/2026 of UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (HOME / POLICE) Vs GULZAR AHMED WANI on 6 June 2026
2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1105/2026 CM(2892/2026) UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS …Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG with Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel. Vs. GULZAR AHMED WANI ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM:
Sr. No. 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1105/2026 CM(2892/2026)
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS
…Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG with
Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel.
Vs.
GULZAR AHMED WANI
...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
06.06.2026
1. Mr. Mohsin Qadri, learned Sr. AAG, vide order dated 19.05.2026, had sought time for having instructions in the matter.
2. Today, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that controversy involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgement passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in WP(C)164/2025 titled as “UT of J&K and others Vs. Imtiyaz Ahmad Laloo and Others”, decided on 30.08.2025, as such, the respondent is entitled to the benefits in terms of the judgement dated 30.08.2025.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE JUDGE
SRINAGAR 06.06.2026 Ishaq