Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/1628/2025 of UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (ACCOUNTANT GENERAL) Vs MEHRAJ UD DIN AND ORS. on 4 June 2026
C ) No. 1628/2025 c/w WP ( C ) No. 2504/2025 WP ( C) No. 69, 76,83 of 2026 WP ( C) No. 3219/2025 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP ( C ) No. 1628/2025 c/w WP ( C ) No. 2504/2025 WP ( C) No. 69, 76,83 of 2026 WP ( C) No. 3219/2025 UT of J&K and others. …
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
UT of J&K and others.
… Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. Jahingeer Dar, GA
Vs.
Mehraj-ud-din & Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through:
Mr. Mr. Hilal Ahmad Wani, Advocate in WP (C) No.2504/2026, Mr. S. A. Qadri, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL JUDGE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUSTICE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
06.06.2026
1. By virtue of order dated 4th June, 2026, we disposed of the writ petition, bearing WP (C) No. 2504/2026, making/issuing, among others, the following observation/direction in its paragraph 04: “4.We clarify that the petitioners shall not recover any alleged excess amount from the respondent which has already been received by him and further the petitioners shall be at liberty to pay retiral benefits to the respondent after deducting the benefit under SRO 59/1990. However, this direction shall remain subject to outcome of the OA.”
2. While having a glimpse of the order dated 4th June 2026 again, particularly paragraph 04 (supra), it has come to fore that due to oversight we have not made mention of “remitting the matter to the learned Tribunal”, albeit we mentioned in the said order that the “direction shall remain subject to outcome of the OA”.
3. Accordingly, taking suo moto note as ingeminated above, we deem it proper to modify the order dated 4th June 2026, by adding the words that “The matter is remitted to the learned Tribunal”. Ordered accordingly.
4. This order shall form part of the order dated 4th June, 2026.
5. Registry to do the needful, in view of above.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR: 06.06.2026 “Ab. Rashid”
Whether the order is reportable? No
Abdul Rashid Ganaie I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document :06.06.2026 17:40