Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/1146/2026 of TANVEER UL ISLAM Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (FOREST DEPARTMENT) on 18 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR (Through Virtual Mode) CM No. 2991/2026 in WP(C) No. 1146/2026 CM No. 2992/2026 Tanveer Ul Islam …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Musavir Mir, Advocate vs Union Territory of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram:

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

(Through Virtual Mode)

CM No. 2991/2026 in

WP(C) No. 1146/2026

CM No. 2992/2026

Tanveer Ul Islam

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Musavir Mir, Advocate

vs

Union Territory of J&K and ors.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through:

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

18.05.2026

WP(C) No. 1146/2026

1. Impugned in this petition filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India is an order and judgment dated 13.05.2026 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar Bench [“The Tribunal”] in OA No. 476/2026 titled, ‘Tanveer ul Islam vs. Union Territory of J&K and ors.’, whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the OA filed by the petitioner seeking quashment of Order No. 22 of 2026 dated 24.04.2026 to the extent it pertains to transfer of the petitioner from Kalaroose Block to Kehnusa Block.

2. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to make a written representation to the Chief Conservator of Forests, Kashmir, Serial No. 45

2 WP(C) No. 1146/2026

challenging the competence of Conservator of Forests Kashmir North Circle Sopore to issue the order of transfer.

3. Statement of learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record.

4. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to make a written representation to the Chief Conservator of Forests, Kashmir within a period of one week from today. We, however provide that in case such representation challenging the competence of Conservator of Forests, Kashmir North Circle Sopore is made by the petitioner within stipulated period, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the Chief Conservator of Forests, Kashmir Region within a period of one week from the date of receipt of such representation. However, we make it clear that till the representation is disposed of by the Chief Conservator of Forests, Kashmir Region, there shall be status quo with regard to posting of the petitioner.

(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR)

JUDGE JUDGE

Jammu 18.05.2026 Neha-II

Whether the order is speaking:

Yes/No Whether the order is reportable:

Yes/No NEHA KUMARI 2026.05.20 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead