Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CRM(M)/314/2026 of SYED REYAZ SHAH Vs SHAHNAZA BEGUM AND OTHERS on 15 May 2026
No. 103 Supplementary Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 314/2026 CrlM(726/2026) Syed Reyaz Shah (34 Years) S/O Mohammad Syed Shah R/O Syed Mohalla, Aloosa Ketsan, Aloosa, Bandipora …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mohammad Saleem Mir,
Serial No. 103
Supplementary Cause list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 314/2026 CrlM(726/2026)
Syed Reyaz Shah (34 Years)
S/O Mohammad Syed Shah
R/O Syed Mohalla, Aloosa
Ketsan, Aloosa, Bandipora
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Mohammad Saleem Mir, Advocate
Vs.
1. Shahnaza Begum
W/O Syed Reyaz Shah
D/O Nazir Ahmad Shah
2. Syed Ishrat (Minor), through
Respondent No.1 (Mother)
3. Syed Insha (Minor), through
Respondent No. 1 (Mother)
4. Syed Aatif (Minor) through
Respondent No. 1 (Mother)
All resident of Aloosa, Ketsan
Bandipora, J&K
At present Hamdania Colony,
Bemina Srinagar
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
15.05.2026
1. Petitioner, through the medium of this petition, invoking supervisory jurisdiction of this Court vested under Section 529 of BNSS, seeks direction upon the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate (2nd Additional Munsiff), Srinagar, to dispose of the complaint titled “Shahnaza Begum & Ors. Vs. Syed Reyaz Shah”, filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complaint has been sub-judice before the court below since 05.06.2023 and its trial has not been concluded till date, though summary proceedings are to be carried out under the Provisions of the DV Act.
3. In view of the pleadings and the submission urged at the Bar, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition on board for further adjudication, having regard to the limited nature of relief sought.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of, at this motion stage, with a direction to the court below to proceed with the matter expeditiously and make an endeavour to dispose of the case within a period of eight weeks from this date.
5. A copy of this order shall be forwarded to the Trial Court, for information and record.
6. The petition is thus, disposed of, along with application(s), in the above terms.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 15.05.2026 “Adil Ismail”