Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/962/2026 of SUN-ESTATES TH.ITS PROPRIETOR Vs DEPUTY COMMMISSIONER (SRINAGAR) AND OTHERS on 5 May 2026
No. 141 Supplementary Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 962/2026 CM(2510/2026) Sun-estates through its prop. Nisar Ahmad Lone, (51 yrs) S/O Ghulam Rasool Lone R/O Lone Mohalla Masjid Aangen Kachumugam Baramulla and Mushtaq Ahmad Wani, Aged 45 Years S/O Abdul
Serial No. 141
Supplementary Cause list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 962/2026 CM(2510/2026)
Sun-estates through its prop.
Nisar Ahmad Lone, (51 yrs)
S/O Ghulam Rasool Lone
R/O
Lone
Mohalla
Masjid
Aangen
Kachumugam Baramulla and
Mushtaq Ahmad Wani, Aged 45 Years
S/O Abdul Aziz Wani
R/O Mini Colony, Chanapora, Srinagar
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Hazim Qureshi, Advocate
Vs.
1.
Deputy Commissioner Srinagar,
Amar
Niwas
Complex,
2nd
Floor
Tankipora, Srinagar, J&K 190001
2.
Additional
Deputy
Commissioner,
Srinagar, 2nd Floor Amar Niwas Complex,
DC Office, Tankipora,
Srinagar, J&K 190001
3.
Assistant
Commissioner
Revenue,
Srinagar, DC Office Complex, Tankipora,
Srinagar, 190001
4.
Tehsildar Central Shalteng,
Bemina Bypass near SDA Office, Srinagar
5.
Naib Tehsildar Central Shalteng, Office
at Bemina Bypass near SDA Office,
Srinagar
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
05.05.2026
1. Petitioner, through the medium of this petition, alleging that respondent No. 4- Tehsildar Central Shalteng, has rejected the application of the petitioner for issuance of Fard on flimsy grounds, unknown to the law, seeks direction upon respondents to do their official duty by attesting/issuing the revenue documents, if all the legal formalities are completed by the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners shall be satisfied if the present petition is disposed of at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to apply afresh for the Fard to the Tehsildar concerned and
with a direction to the Tehsildar to decide the matter with regard to issuance of Fard, strictly in accordance with law.
5. In view of the of the innocuous nature of prayer and submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of at this motion stage with liberty to the petitioner to apply afresh for the issuance of the Fard to Tehsildar Central Shalteng and in the event of doing so, respondent- Tehsildar Central Shalteng is directed to consider issuance of the Fard, strictly in accordance with law. It is further clarified that in the event of rejection of his plea for grant of Fard, petitioner shall explore the remedy of challenging the same before the competent revenue authorities.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of, on the above terms, along with connected application(s).
(M. A. CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 05.05.2026 “Adil Ismail”