Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Mac App/76/2020 of AMIRUDDIN SHAH Vs TAZEEMA BEGUM AND OTHERS on 4 May 2026
135 Suppl. Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Mac App. No. 76/2020 CM No. 6223/2025 Amiruddin Shah (Dead) through LRs (i) Waseem Ahmad Shah S/o Amiruddin Shah, Aged 50 years (ii) Naseer Ahmad Shah S/o Amiruddin Shah, Aged 45 years (iii) Saqib Ahmad Shah S/o
S. No. 135
Suppl. Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
Mac App. No. 76/2020
CM No. 6223/2025
Amiruddin Shah (Dead) through LRs
(i)
Waseem Ahmad Shah S/o Amiruddin
Shah, Aged 50 years
(ii)
Naseer Ahmad Shah S/o Amiruddin
Shah, Aged 45 years
(iii)
Saqib Ahmad Shah S/o Amiruddin
Shah, Aged 42 years
(iv)
Asima D/o Amiruddin Shah, Aged 35
years
(v)
Atiqa Begum Wd/o Amiruddin Shah,
Aged 75 years
…Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. N. H. Shah, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Saima Ghulam, Advocate
Vs.
1.
Tazeema Begum W/o Mohammad Iqbal
Mir.
2.
Habsa Iqbal D/o Mohammad Iqbal Mir
through her mother R/o G-2 Police
Housing Colony Bemina Srinagar.
3.
Syed Aiqub Hussain S/o Syed Jawaid
Hussain
R/o
Gingal
Uri
Baramulla
Kashmir (Driver of O/V (Scorpio) bearing No. JK05-B/3982).
4.
Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd.
through its Divisional Manager Divisional Office 3rd Floor Lake City Plaza Kara Nagar Srinagar.
5.
Mohammad Nadeem Sheikh S/o Bashir
Ahmad
Sheikh
R/o
Deevan
Bagh,
Baramulla, Kashmir (Prosp. Owner of O/V
(Scorpio) bearing No. JK05-B/3982.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Imtiyaz Ahmad, Advocate for R-4
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
04.05.2026
CM No. 6223/2025:
01. This application has been moved by the applicants namely, (i) Waseem Ahmad Shah (Son), (ii) Naseer Ahmad Shah (Son), (iii) Saqib Ahmad Shah (Son), (iv) Asima (Daughter) and (v) Atiqa
Begum (Widow), for bringing on record as legal heirs of the deceased appellant-Amiruddin Shah, in Mac App. No. 76/2020, filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
02. It is asserted in the application that the appellant-Amiruddin Shah, has died during the pendency of the appeal, leaving behind the aforementioned legal heirs.
03. The application is supported by an affidavit duly sworn by the applicant-Asima, daughter of the deceased appellant.
04. Learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondent No.4-Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company, has not objected to this application.
05. This application is, thus, allowed and the legal representatives as detailed in the application are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased appellant.
06. CM No. 6223/2025 is disposed of. Mac App. No. 76/2020:
07. The appellant preferred the present appeal against the Award dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Srinagar, in MACP No. 694/2018 titled “Tazeema Begum and Anr. vs. Amiruddin Shah and Ors.”, whereby the compensation to the tune of Rs.33,29,480/- (minus any interim compensation, if already paid), along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of presentation of the claim petition till its final realization, was awarded in favour of the claimants. The Award amount was directed to be paid by the respondent No.4-Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company, with liberty to recover the same from the appellant herein as the owner of the offending vehicle.
08. During the pendency of the appeal, the case was referred for mediation, and a report dated 13.04.2026 formulated by Mr. Javid Alam, learned Mediator has been filed with the statement “that the Respondent-Insurance Company voluntarily waives and relinquishes the recovery rights granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Srinagar, and has no objection if the present appeal is disposed of accordingly”. As such, the learned Mediator has concluded the mediation proceedings as successful and submitted the report before this court.
09. Learned counsel for the appellant and the contesting respondent No. 4- Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company, have jointly submitted before this Court that the contesting parties have settled the matter, and the Respondent No.4–Insurance Company has waived its right of recovery of the awarded amount payable to the claimants from the appellant herein, as owner of the offending vehicle.
10. In the aforesaid backdrop, nothing remains to be adjudicated by this Court in this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of as having been settled by the contesting parties through the process of mediation, whereby the Respondent No.4–Bajaj Allianz Insurance Company has waived of its recovery right from the appellant herein.
11. The appeal along with all connected CM(s), stands disposed of.
12. The Registry is directed to return the Trial Court Record along with a copy of this order, for information and record.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 04.05.2026 Manzoor Manzoor Ul Hassan Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Srinagar 07.05.2026 01.37