Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CRM(M)/260/2026 of SHABIR AHMAD PARRAY Vs MOHAMMAD ZIYAN PARRAY AND ANOTHER on 4 May 2026
No. 12 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 260/2026 CrlM(614/2026) Shabir Ahmad Parray, Aged 45 Years S/O Abdul Gani Parray R/O Gulabagh Potter Mohalla Mansbal, Ganderbal …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Khursheed, Advocate Vs. 1.
Serial No. 12
Regular Cause list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 260/2026 CrlM(614/2026)
Shabir Ahmad Parray, Aged 45 Years
S/O Abdul Gani Parray
R/O Gulabagh Potter Mohalla
Mansbal, Ganderbal
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Bhat Khursheed, Advocate
Vs.
1. Mohammad Ziyan Parray
2. Mohammad Zaid Parray
Both sons of Shabir Ahmad Parray
Both residents of Pehlipora Safapora
Ganderbal, minors through their mother
namely Mst. Fatima Akber
D/O Mohammad Akbar Rather
R/O Pehlipora Safapora Ganderbal
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
04.05.2026 Petitioner, through the medium of this petition, seeks quashment of execution of Lok Adalat Award dated 11.05.2024, along with all consequential orders pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ganderbal, in case titled “Mohd. Ziyan Parray & Anr. Vs. Shabir Ahmad Parray”. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to contest the matter before the court below, raising all the grounds available to the petitioner, in opposition to the execution of the Lok Adalat Award. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this motion stage, with liberty to the petitioner to contest the matter before the court below. The court below, however, is requested not to pass any coercive orders, without hearing the petitioner, on the next date fixed in the matter.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 04.05.2026 “Adil Ismail”