Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/830/2026 of TAJA BEGUM Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OHERS (REVENUE) on 22 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 241 Suppl. Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 830/2026 CM(2138/2026) Caveat 831/2026 Mst. Taja Begum Age: 78 years. W/O Late Ghulam Hassan Magray. R/O Mohalla Sadak, Janglat Mandi, Tehsil & District Anantnag, J&K. ...Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Serial No. 241

Suppl. Cause List

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

WP(C) 830/2026 CM(2138/2026)

Caveat 831/2026

Mst. Taja Begum Age: 78 years.

W/O Late Ghulam Hassan Magray.

R/O Mohalla Sadak, Janglat Mandi,

Tehsil & District Anantnag, J&K.

...Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: -

Mr. Mohammad Ibrahim Mehraj, Advocate.

V/s

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir through Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Civil Secretarit, Srinagar-190010.

2. Financial Commissioner (Revenue)

DC Office, Tankipora, Srinagar 190001.

3. Divisonal Commissioner, Kashmir

Srinagar, J&K-DC Office, Tankipora, Srinagar-190001.

4. Deputy Commissioner, Anantnag

Distrioct Anantnag, J&K-DC Office Anantnag Mehman

Mohalla, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir 192101.

5. Tehsildar, Anantnag District Anantnag, J&K-DC Office Anantnag Mehman Mohalla, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir 192101.

6. Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil and District Anantnag, J&K-DC Office Anantnag

Mehman Mohalla, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir 192101.

7. Bal Krishen Koul

S/O Late Dina Nath Koul

R/O House No. 115 Lane No. 2 Om Vihar Talabtillo.

Camp Road Jammu.

8. Smt. Champa Devi

D/O Late Dina Nath

W/O Pushkar Nath Saproo

R/O Vinayak Nagar, Muthi, Jammu.

9. Rajesh Kaul S/O Late Piarylal Koul R/O Amar Colony Gole, Gujral, Jammu.

10. Ritesh Koul S/O Late Piarylal Koul R/O Amar Colony Gole, Gujral, Jammu.

11. Ramesh Koul S/O Late Avtar Krishan Koul

R/O Nayak Vihar, Muthi Jammu

12. Rick Koul

S/O Late Avtar Krishan Koul

R/O Nayak Vihar, Muthi Jammu

13. Smt. Bitta Koul

W/O Late Avtar Krishen Koul

R/O Nnank Vihar, Muthi Jammu.

… Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. Lone Altaf, Advocate for Caveator/Respondent No. 7.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.

(ORDER) 22.04.2026

Caveat No. 831/2026:-

01. With the appearance of Mr. Lone Altaf, learned counsel for caveator/respondent No.7, the caveat stands discharged. WP(C) No. 830/2026:-

02. Petitioner, through the medium of this petition, seeks setting aside of Order dated 23rd of March, 2026, passed by the learned Financial Commissioner Revenue, J&K, whereby an appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 7 of ‘The Migrant Immovable Property (Preservation, Protection and Restraint on Distress Sales) Act, 1997’ has been dismissed, and quashment of eviction notice dated 15th of December, 2025 and consequential actions thereof, including forcible dispossession of the petitioner from the property in question.

03. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the caveator/Respondent No. 7, stated that the petitioner has only filed the appeal against the order passed in appeal and the notice of eviction and has not challenged the basic order dated 15th of December, 2025, passed by Tehsildar, Anantnag and subsequent orders following thereafter.

04. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly accepted this plea raised by the learned counsel for the Caveator/respondent No. 7 and submits that despite applying for seeking the copy of the basic order, and also invoking the Right to Information Act (RTI) provisions, the petitioner was not provided the copy of the basic order, as such, he had come to this Court through the medium of this writ petition.

05. Be that as it may, the documents produced by the learned counsel for the caveator/respondent No. 7 are taken on record and copies thereof are ordered to be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner to avail the legal remedy available to him.

06. This writ petition, is thus, disposed of at this motion stage with liberty to the petitioner to avail the legal remedy.

07. In case there is any delay on the part of the petitioner in pursuing this case before the Court, the same shall be considered by the Revenue Officer concerned as per law.

08. This petition is, accordingly, disposed of along with all pending applications, with the afore-stated observations.

(M. A. CHOWDHARY)

JUDGE SRINAGAR April 22nd, 2026 “Shoaib javid”

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead