Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/628/2026 of MUDASIR HUSSAIN BANDAY Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.COMMMR/SECTY TO GOVT (GAD) AND OTHERS on 2 April 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(1604/2026) in WP(C) 628/2026 CM(1605/2026). Mudasir Hussain Banday. …Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Aijaz Ahmad Chisti, Advocate VERSUS Union Territory Of J And K & Ors. …Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Maha Majeed,
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CM(1604/2026) in WP(C) 628/2026
CM(1605/2026).
Mudasir Hussain Banday.
…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. Aijaz Ahmad Chisti, Advocate
VERSUS
Union Territory Of J And K & Ors.
…Respondent(s)
Through:
Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel vice
Mr. Mohsin S Qadri, Senior AAG.
Mr. Bikram Deep Singh, Dy AG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.04.2026
01. The manner in which the petitioner has come to petition this Court bearing a prayer for seeking quashment of Government Order No. O4-JK-GAD(Vig) of 2026 dated 22.01.2026 is really disturbing in the sense that a snapshot of the order without the text of the order is being cited as a document thereby expecting this Court to read by assumption that the sanction stands granted for prosecution of the public servants as mentioned in the subject of the snapshot copy of the order.
02. This Court is puzzled as to how the petitioner has laid his hands on the snapshot of said Government Order.
156 Suppl- I
03. This Court cannot be expected to respond to a snapshot of Government Order No. O4-JK-GAD(Vig) of 2026 dated 22.01.2026 without even knowing the first letter of very said Government Order.
04. As such, petition is dismissed.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 02.04.2026 Bisma Jan.