Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CM(M)/78/2026 of MOHAMMAD KHALEEL AND ANOTHER Vs MEHRAJ UD DIN SHEIKH AND ANOTHER on 23 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) 78/2026 CM(1215/2026)] MOHAMMAD KHALEEL AND ANOTHER ….. Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Fayaz, Advocate with Ms. Nighat Parveen, Advocate. V/s MEHRAJ UD DIN SHEIKH AND ANOTHER ….. Respondent(s) Through: Coram:
05
Regular
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) 78/2026 CM(1215/2026)]
MOHAMMAD KHALEEL AND ANOTHER
….. Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Bhat Fayaz, Advocate
with Ms. Nighat Parveen,
Advocate.
V/s
MEHRAJ UD DIN SHEIKH AND ANOTHER
….. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
23.03.2026
1. The two petitioners, who are the plaintiffs before the trial court, preferred a suit on 27.12.2018 before the court of Additional District Judge, Srinagar.
2. In said civil suit, the petitioners have named two respondents herein as two defendants.
3. In said civil suit, two respondents came forward with their written statement filed on 08.03.2023 which came to be entertained and the suit getting posted for framing of issues and arguments.
4. From said date of 8th March, 2023, the petitioners, as plaintiffs, have been appearing on successive dates of hearing P a g e | 2 CM(M) 78/2026 CM(1215/2026)]
in civil suit without getting bothered by the fact that the written statement from the end of the two respondents have come to be entertained beyond the prescribed period of filing of the written statement. It has occurred to two petitioners only in March, 2026 to bear an agitation that the written statement from the end of the respondents ought not to have taken place in March 2023.
5. The petitioner has approached with the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India after three years of putting up with fact of order dated 08.03.2023.
6. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present writ petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.
7. Copy of this order be forwarded to the court of Additional District Judge, Srinagar for being taken on record.
(Rahul Bharti)
Judge
SRINAGAR 23.03.2026 Aasif