Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CRM(M)/725/2025 of AAMIR AHMAD KHAN Vs UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION BATAMALOO (POLICE / HOME) on 9 March 2026
No.06 REGULAR CAUSE LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 725/2025 CrlM(1807/2025) Aamir Ahmad Khan …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mohammad Rafiq, Advocate vice Mr. Naveed Naseem, Advocate Vs. Union Territory Through SHO Police Station Batamaloo.
Serial No.06
REGULAR CAUSE LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 725/2025 CrlM(1807/2025)
Aamir Ahmad Khan
…Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. Mohammad Rafiq, Advocate vice
Mr. Naveed Naseem, Advocate
Vs.
Union Territory Through SHO
Police Station Batamaloo.
...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
09.03.2026
1. Ever since this case was instituted by the petitioner through Advocate Mr. Naveed Naseem, the learned Advocate has not bothered to cause appearance, as the only appearance in the case was on 21.11.2025 through proxy counsel Mr. Mohammad Rafiq and, thereafter, for last two consecutive dates of hearing the counsel for the petitioner was not present and today also is the same scenario except that on his behalf Mr. Mohammad Rafiq, Advocate as proxy counsel is making a repeat request for adjournment.
2. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 09.03.2026 “Mir Arif”