Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CR/54/2025 of JOGINDER SINGH Vs ABDUL SALAAM RAINA AND ORS. on 3 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Suppl List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM/1006/2026 IN CR/54/2025 JOGINDER SINGH Petitioner(s)… Through: Ms. Insha Rashid, Adv. Vs. ABDUL SALAAM RAINA AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI JUDGE ORDER 03.03.2026 1.

S. No.61

Suppl List

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

CM/1006/2026 IN CR/54/2025

JOGINDER SINGH

Petitioner(s)…

Through: Ms. Insha Rashid, Adv.

Vs.

ABDUL SALAAM RAINA AND ORS.

...Respondent(s)

Through:

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

03.03.2026

1. Ms. Insha Rashid, Advocate for the petitioner, who figures as defendant No. 20 in a civil suit preferred by the respondents No. 1 and 2, namely Abdul Salam Raina and Javed Ahmad Raina, before the Court of Munsiff (Additional Special Mobile Magistrate), Pahalgam.

2. The petitioner, being defendant No. 20 in said suit, had sought rejection of plaint by recourse to Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

3. Said plea of the petitioner came to be rejected by virtue of an order dated 28th June 2025, aggrieved whereof, the petitioner has filed the present civil revision petition.

4. Today, Ms. Insha Rashid, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to withdraw present revision petition purportedly on account of the fact that the plaintiffs intend to withdraw their civil suit. However, it is submitted that the indulgence granted by this Court in terms of order dated 24th September 2025 is coming in the way of the Court of learned Munsiff (Additional Special Mobile Magistrate), Pahalgam, to accord dismissal to the civil suit as withdrawn.

5. This Court makes it clear to the Court of Munsiff (Additional Special Mobile Magistrate), Pahalgam that in case the plaintiffs are seeking simpliciter withdrawal of the civil suit, then the said withdrawal be allowed and copy of the order of dismissal of the suit as withdrawn be forwarded for being taken on record of this civil revision for enabling the disposal of this revision petition as being rendered infructuous in view of the dismissal of the suit having taken place as withdrawn.

6. A copy of this order be forwarded by the Registrar Judicial, Srinagar, to the Court of Munsiff (Additional Special Mobile Magistrate), Pahalgam.

(RAHUL BHARTI)

JUDGE SRINAGAR 03.03.2026 Hilal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead