Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CM(M)/550/2025 of SHOWKAT AHMAD DAR AND ANR Vs ZAINA BEGUM on 2 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

REGULAR CAUSE LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) No. 550/2025 Showkat Ahmad Dar and Anr. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Tariq M. Shah, Advocate Vs. Zaina Begum ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER

Serial No. 09

REGULAR CAUSE LIST

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

CM(M) No. 550/2025

Showkat Ahmad Dar and Anr.

…Petitioner(s)

Through:

Mr. Tariq M. Shah, Advocate

Vs.

Zaina Begum

...Respondent(s)

Through:

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

02.03.2026

1. In a civil suit on file No. 02/2025 instituted on 03.01.2025 by the respondent/plaintiff-Zaina Begum, acting through attorney holder-Ishfaq Ahmad Sheikh before the Court of Civil Judge/Senior Division (Mobile Magistrate), Pulwama, the two petitioners herein, figuring as defendants, upon their appearance came up not only with the written statement but also with an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, thereby seeking rejection of the plaint.

2. This application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed on 23.05.2025.

3. The two petitioners, as defendants, are aggrieved that said application of the petitioners is receiving no attention for adjudication from the trial court as a result whereof the petitioners, as defendants, are in a state of lingering suspense.

4. The petitioners are, thus, seeking supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for a direction unto the trial court to dispose of said application of the petitioners maintained under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

5. This petition is disposed of at its very inception stage by directing the Court of Civil Judge/Senior Division (Mobile Magistrate), Pulwama to take up and adjudicate with said application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 of the petitioners within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order to be delivered by the petitioners on the file of the suit before the Court below.

6. Disposed of.

(RAHUL BHARTI)

JUDGE

SRINAGAR: 02.03.2026 Shabroz

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead