Jammu and Kashmir High Court
TrP (C)/13/2025 of VINEET KOUL Vs BAL KRISHEN PANDITA AND ORS. on 13 February 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(5693/2025) inTrP (C) 13/2025 CM(5694/2025). VINEET KOUL. …Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. VERSUS BAL KRISHEN PANDITA AND ORS. …Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Z. A . Qureshi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yahaya, Advocate. CORAM:
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CM(5693/2025) inTrP (C) 13/2025
CM(5694/2025).
VINEET KOUL.
…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:
None.
VERSUS
BAL KRISHEN PANDITA AND ORS.
…Respondent(s)
Through:
Mr. Z. A. Qureshi, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Yahaya, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
13.02.2026
01. The non-applicants/respondents have maintained a civil suit before the Court of Sub Judge, Srinagar in which the applicant/petitioner figures as defendant No. 1.
02. Considering the nature of the cause of action set up by the non- applicants/respondents in their civil suit, the institution of the civil suit before the Court of Sub-Judge, Srinagar is fully justified.
03. The applicant/petitioner, however, seeks transfer of the civil suit from the Court of Sub Judge, Srinagar to a court of competent jurisdiction in Jammu on the ground of convenience.
04. This Court finds no good ground for accommodating the applicant/petitioner on this basis.
05. Accordingly, the application is dismissed, notwithstanding the absence of counsel for the applicant/petitioner.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 13.02.2026 Bisma Jan. 09 Regular