Jammu and Kashmir High Court
TrP (C)/1/2026 of HAMEEDA Vs FAROOQ AHMAD RATHER on 3 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Trp(C) No. 1/2026 HAMEEDA ….. Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bilal Ahmad Malla, Adv. V/s FAROOQ AHMAD RATHER ….. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti, Judge ORDER 03.02.2026 1. Through the
02
Regular
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
Trp(C) No. 1/2026
HAMEEDA
….. Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Bilal Ahmad Malla, Adv.
V/s
FAROOQ AHMAD RATHER
….. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rahul Bharti, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.02.2026
1. Through the medium of the present transfer application the applicant-Mst. Hameeda is invoking Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for transfer of a review petition which is stated to have been preferred by her in a pending civil suit titled “Farooq Ahmad Rather Vs. Raja and Others” and others in the court of Sub Judge, Ganderbal.
2. The review petition is related to an order dated 06.07.2023 passed by the Court of Sub Judge, Ganderbal.
3. The applicant has not taken a labour of even annexing certified copy of order dated 06.07.2023 with respect to which the applicant has preferred the review petition before the court of Sub Judge.
P a g e | 2 Trp(C) No. 1/2026
4. A certified copy of the review petition has also not been placed on record of this transfer application for the purpose of proprietary of maintaining this transfer application.
5. It seems that the applicant is taking the institution of High Court for granted that without requisite documents annexed with the transfer application which is just a barren application only hearing self-serving averments of the applicant. Therefore case does not warrant any indulgence from this Court in the matter, as such the application is dismissed.
6. Copy of this order be forwarded to the learned Sub Judge, Ganderbal for being taken on record.
(Rahul Bharti)
Judge
SRINAGAR 03.02.2026 Aasif