Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/452/2023 of NEELOFAR JAND AND ANR. Vs ROHIE FIRDOUS on 28 January 2026
No.18 REGULAR CAUSE LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 452/2023 in [FAO 14/2019] Neelofar Jan and Anr. …Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs. Rohie Firdous ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mohd Younis Bhat, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL
Serial No.18
REGULAR CAUSE LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 452/2023 in [FAO 14/2019]
Neelofar Jan and Anr.
…Petitioner(s)
Through:
None
Vs.
Rohie Firdous
...Respondent(s)
Through:
Mr. Mohd Younis Bhat, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.01.2026
1. By virtue of an order dated 13.10.2022, this Court came to dispose of FAO No. 14/2019 read with RP No. 66/2021.
2. This Court came to place an arrangement for facilitating the interaction of the petitioners, who are the real paternal aunts of minor child, Mohammad Aqdus S/o late Mushtaq Ahmad Malik, who was and is in the custody of his mother-Mst. Rohie Firdous, the respondent herein.
3. The two petitioners have come forward with the present contempt petition alleging that the respondent is not acting in compliance with the arrangement so MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 29.01.26
set in by this Court in terms of order dated 13.03.2022 read with order dated 05.12.2022.
4. Mr. Mohd Younis Bhat, learned counsel for the respondent, submits that his client is honouring the arrangement in letter and spirit and the minor son is now 12 years old bearing a matured understanding which enables him to exercise his own discretion as well.
5. Given the fact that the respondent has accepted the arrangement, as such, the same is supposed to last till the minor attains the age of majority or the arrangement is altered at the instance of either of the parties.
6. This contempt petition is, thus, disposed of with a direction to the respondent to ensure letter and spirit compliance of the arrangement set in by this Court.
7. Disposed of.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 28.01.2026 “Mir Arif”
MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 29.01.26