Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Bail App/90/2025 of MANSHO Vs UT OF J AND K TH POLICE STATION SAMBA on 24 November 2025
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Bail App No. 90/2025 CrlM No. 2099/2025 CrlM No. 532/2025 CrlM No. 531/2025 Mansho, Aged 35 years S/O Hussain, R/O Vill. Naglota, Tehsil Chennani, District Udhampur …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Idrees Saleem Dar, Advocate. q vs UT
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Bail App No. 90/2025
CrlM No. 2099/2025
CrlM No. 532/2025
CrlM No. 531/2025
Mansho, Aged 35 years
S/O Hussain,
R/O Vill. Naglota, Tehsil Chennani,
District Udhampur
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Idrees Saleem Dar, Advocate.
q
vs
UT of J&K through
Police Station Samba
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
24.11.2025
01. Petitioner, through the medium of this application, seeks grant of interim bail, having been unsuccessful in his earlier endeavour to seek the same relief before the trial court i.e. the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Samba, in case titled “UT of J&K vs. Mansho & Anr.” arising out of FIR No. 309/2022 for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 8/15/29 NDPS Act, registered at Police Station, Samba.
02. Pursuant to the notice, respondents have filed objections to the bail application opposing the grant of relief of interim bail, on many grounds.
03. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been suffering from a serious eye ailment for which he had undergone treatment at AIIMS, Delhi and since his eyesight has diminished, he now requires corneal transplant; that the applicant was earlier admitted to interim bail by the trial court, and after expiry of that period, he applied again for its extension, which request was declined by the trial court primarily on the ground that petitioner failed to surrender upon expiry of the previous interim bail period.
04. Considering the medical condition of the petitioner as supported by the medical record, he requires specialised check-ups and treatment, the application is 02
2 Bail App No. 90/2024
allowed merely on humanitarian/medical grounds and petitioner is admitted to interim bail for a period of 60 days, subject to furnishing personal bond/bail bond to the satisfaction of the trial court. The applicant, however, shall surrender before the Superintendent, District Jail, Kathua immediately upon expiry of this period. The application is considered only on humanitarian medical grounds and nothing herein shall be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The applicant shall remain at liberty to seek regular bail before the trial court.
05. Disposed of.
(MA Chowdhary)
Judge
Jammu 24.11.2025 Abinash