Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/3339/2025 of QUARATAL AIN DAR AND ANR. Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (POLICE / HOME) on 30 December 2025

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 3339/2025 Quaratal Ain Dar and Anr. ........................................... Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Asif Wani, Advocate. q vs UT of J&K and Ors

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

WP(C) No. 3339/2025

Quaratal Ain Dar and Anr. ........................................... Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Asif Wani, Advocate.

q

vs

UT of J&K and Ors ........................................................................ Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Illyas Nazir Laway, GA.

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE

ORDER

30.12.2025

01. The petitioners having attained the age of majority have entered into wedlock out of their free will and volition. Petitioners have placed on record their respective Date of Birth Certificates, issued by the competent authorities. The petitioners, however, apprehend danger to their matrimonial life at the hands of private respondents.

02. It is trite in law that any person having attained the age of consent is entitled to marry as per his/her choice and the Government, in particular the police agency is under an obligation to protect the life of its citizens. It appears that petitioners have not approached the official respondents for indulgence in the matter.

03. Having regard to the limited nature of controversy and the relief prayed for, the present petition is admitted to hearing at its threshold and is disposed of by providing that official respondents shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for adequate security cover to make sure that nobody is allowed to interfere in their matrimonial life, provided there is no legal impediment. Sr. No. 189

2 WP(C) No. 3339/2025

Page 1 of 2

04. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion about validity or authenticity of the marriage and the documents/certificates annexed with the petition and this order shall not come in the way of the police agency for investigation of FIR/criminal complaint, if any, filed against the petitioners.

05. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(Rajesh Sekhri) Judge

Srinagar 30.12.2025 Isaq

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead