Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CM(M)/518/2025 of MOHAMMAD SHAFI PARRAY Vs FAYAZ AHMAD MIR on 29 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR (Through virtual mode) Case: CM (M ) No. 518/2025 CM No. 7720/2025 Caveat No. 2943/2025 Caveat No. 2098/2025 Mohammad Shafi Parray …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Malik Mushtaq, Advocate. V/s Fayaz Ahmad Mir ….
Sr. No.07
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
(Through virtual mode)
Case: CM (M ) No. 518/2025
CM No. 7720/2025
Caveat No. 2943/2025
Caveat No. 2098/2025
Mohammad Shafi Parray
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Malik Mushtaq, Advocate.
V/s
Fayaz Ahmad Mir
…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Syed Hamid, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
29.12.2025
When the question of maintainability was put to learned counsel for the petitioner, he submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to the remedy as may be available under law. He further submits that the appeal would be barred by limitation and requests that the limitation period should not come in the way of filing the appeal. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to the remedy as may be available under law. However, the time spent in filing this petition shall be excluded from the period of limitation. (VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
Jammu 29.12.2025 Renu