Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CM(M)/295/2025 of ABDUL MAJID MIR AND ANR. Vs SHAKILA AND ANR. on 24 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

102 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M)/295/2025 ABDUL MAJID MIR AND ANR. …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs. SHAKILA AND ANR. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ali Mohammad Dar, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI

S. No. 102

Regular Cause List

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

CM(M)/295/2025

ABDUL MAJID MIR AND ANR.

…Appellant/Petitioner(s)

Through: None

Vs.

SHAKILA AND ANR.

...Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Ali Mohammad Dar, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

24.12.2025 None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners in this petition on the last three consecutive dates of hearing. Today also, no one has appeared for the petitioners, which makes it clear that petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)

JUDGE

SRINAGAR 24.12.2025 Shabroz

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead