Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CRM(M)/810/2025 of IMRAN AHMAD SHEIKH Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME / POLICE) on 20 December 2025
56 Suppl. Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CrlM/2049/2025 IN CRM(M)/810/2025 IMRAN AHMAD SHEIKH …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M.S. Reshi, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Jahingeer Ahmad Dar, GA
S. No. 56
Suppl. Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CrlM/2049/2025 IN CRM(M)/810/2025
IMRAN AHMAD SHEIKH
…Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. M.S. Reshi, Advocate
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS.
...Respondent(s)
Through:
Mr. Jahingeer Ahmad Dar, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
20.12.2025 A warrant of arrest has been issued by the Trial Court on account of the petitioner remaining absent before it. Instead of approaching the Court which has issued the said warrant, the petitioner has approached this Court through the medium of the present petition. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking bail. Learned counsel for the respondents has raised an objection regarding the maintainability of the same. Having considered the submissions made and the objection so raised, it is apparent that the petitioner, instead of approaching the Trial Court which has issued the warrant of arrest on account of his absence, has approached this Court seeking bail. Since the warrant of arrest has been issued by the Trial Court, it is that Court which is competent to recall the said order and consider the prayer for bail. The present petition, therefore, is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner is however at liberty to approach the Trial Court, which shall consider and decide the matter expeditiously.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 20.12.2025 Shabroz