Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Bail App/59/2025 of ISHFAQ AHMAD RATHER Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR. (HOME) on 17 December 2025
2 Regular list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Through virtual mode Bail App 59/2025 ISHFAQ AHMAD RATHER Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. S. T. Hussain, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nida Nazir, Adv. Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR. (HOME) ...Respondent(s) Through:
S. No. 2
Regular list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
Through virtual mode
Bail App 59/2025
ISHFAQ AHMAD RATHER
Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. S. T. Hussain, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nida Nazir, Adv.
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR.
(HOME)
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Maha Majeed, Adv.
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.12.2025
1. Petitioner has moved this application for grant of bail in his favour in a case pending before Principles Sessions Court, Srinagar titled “UT of J & K through P/S Soura, Srinagar vs Ishfaq Ahmad Rather” arising out of FIR No. 22/2017 under Sections 302 & 120-B RPC in P/S Soura.
2. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the trial court has posted the main case for final arguments, however, there is a delay in disposal of the case, and, as such, the petitioner has moved this application for grant of bail. He further submits that he has instructions not to pursue this application in case this court directs the trial court to conclude the hearing of the case at an early date.
3. It appears from the Order dated 16.12.2025 passed by the Trial Court, which is made available, that the court is seized of the matter for final hearing in the case and the case is again listed today for continuation of arguments and it is expected that the trial court is in the process of concluding the case finally, within a short span of time.
4. In this view of the matter, this Bail Application is disposed of as not pressed with the direction to the trial court to dispose of the matter at the earliest possible, failing which bail plea shall be considered.
5. Disposed of.
;
(MA CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 17.12.2025/Hilal