Jammu and Kashmir High Court

Bail App/184/2025 of MUDASIR FAROOQ HAJAM Vs UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION PARIMPORA (POLICE / HOME) on 24 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 06 Regular Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Through Virtual Mode Bail App 184/2025 CrlM(1298/2025) Mudasir Farooq Hajam … Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: - Mr Syed Sajad Geelani, Advocate. V/s Union Territory of J&K … Respondent(s)

Serial No. 06

Regular Cause List

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

Through Virtual Mode

Bail App 184/2025 CrlM(1298/2025)

Mudasir Farooq Hajam

… Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: -

Mr Syed Sajad Geelani, Advocate.

V/s

Union Territory of J&K

… Respondent(s)

Through: -

None.

CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.

(ORDER)

24.11.2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Petitioner through the medium of the present application seeks release on bail in case arising out of FIR No. 14/2021 of Police StationParimpora for the commission of offence punishable under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act and sub-judice before the Court of learned Special Judge, NDPS Court, Srinagar.

2. In view of the fact as is elucidated from the scanned record of the trial Court, the case of the Petitioner is posted for final hearing, as such, it will be in the interests of justice that the Petitioner should wait for final disposal of the case when it is already in the process of being finally heard.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner at this stage submits that the petitioner shall not press this application in case this Court is pleased to direct the Court to decide the matter, expeditiously and in case the matter is delayed due to any reason not attributable to the petitioner, the application

moved for grant of bail shall be considered by the Trial Court. His statement is taken on record

4. In view of the fact that the trial of the main case in which petitioner seeks bail, has been concluded and is to be finally heard by the Trial court, the Bail Application is disposed of as not pressed, in view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is, however, provided that in case the final disposal is delayed, for any reason not attributable to the petitioner, an application for grant of bail, if moved by him, shall be considered by the Trial Court.

5. Disposed of, along with connected application(s).

(M. A. CHOWDHARY)

JUDGE SRINAGAR 24th November, 2025 Shoaib Javid

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead