Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CRM(M)/597/2025 of ISHTIYAQ AHMAD KASANA Vs SHAMIM AHMAD RATHER on 24 November 2025
No. 03 Regular Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Through Virtual Mode CRM(M) 597/2025 CrlM(1475/2025) CrlM(1476/2025) Ishtiyaq Ahmad Kasana … Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. F. A . Wani, Advocate. V/s Shamim Ahmad Rather … Respondent(s)
Serial No. 03
Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
Through Virtual Mode
CRM(M) 597/2025 CrlM(1475/2025) CrlM(1476/2025)
Ishtiyaq Ahmad Kasana
… Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: -
Mr. F. A. Wani, Advocate.
V/s
Shamim Ahmad Rather
… Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.
(ORDER)
24.11.2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner through the medium of this petition seeks quashment of warrant of arrest issued by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate (Munsiff), Kangan against the petitioner in a case titled“Shamim Ahmad Rather Vs. Ishtiyaq Ahmad Kasana”, whereby execution is being carried out in a case relating to Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act which was settled by compromise, by the parties with an undertaking that the payment shall be made by the petitioner within a period of six months i.e., up to 30th of June, 2025.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has made payment of more than half of the amount and he is in the process of liquidating rest of the amount after arranging funds, however, it has come as a surprise to the petitioner that the warrant of arrest has been issued.
3. Mr. Wani further submits that the petitioner shall feel satisfied with the disposal of the petition at this stage with a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate to consider the
application of the petitioner for recalling of the warrant in case it is moved before the Court. His statement is taken on record.
4. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate to consider the application of the petitioner for recalling of the warrant of arrest, in case it is moved before it, and pass appropriate orders thereon as per law.
5. Disposed of, along with connected CrlM(s).
(M. A. CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 24th November, 2025 Shoaib Javid