Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CRM(M)/697/2025 of MUSHTAQ AHMAD PARRAY Vs SABEENA BEGUM AND ORS. on 12 November 2025
No. 57 Supplementary-1 Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR [Through Virtual Mode] CRM (M) No. 697/2025 CrlM No. 1747/2025 Mushtaq Ahmad Parray … Petitioner(s) Through: - Mr Mohammad Rafiq Bhat, Advocate. V/s Sabeena Begum & Ors. … Respondent(s)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No. 57 Supplementary-1 Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
[Through Virtual Mode]
CRM (M) No. 697/2025 CrlM No. 1747/2025
Mushtaq Ahmad Parray … Petitioner(s)
Through: -
Mr Mohammad Rafiq Bhat, Advocate.
V/s
Sabeena Begum & Ors. … Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.
(ORDER) 12.11.2025
01. Through the medium of the instant Petition, the Petitioner is seeking quashing of proceedings initiated against him by the Complainants/ Respondents herein before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattan in two separate Complaints/ applications, on same set of facts is being prosecuted in two separate Complaints/ applications before the learned Magistrate, filed by the same Complainants/ Respondents herein.
02. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the Petitioner shall feel satisfied in the event the present Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Magistrate to consider and take note of the plea raised by the Petitioner in this Petition with regard to two separate Complaints/ applications having been filed against the Petitioner by the same Complainants, on the same set of facts.
03. Having regard to the submission made by the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, the instant Petition, at this stage, is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Magistrate to consider the plea of the Petitioner herein regarding pendency of two separate Complaints/
applications against him, filed by the same Complainants/ Respondents herein on same set of facts, and pass appropriate Orders thereon as per law.
04. Disposed of, along with the connected CrlM.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 12th November, 2025 <TAHIR= Tahir Manzoor Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document